{"id":90045,"date":"2026-10-11T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-11T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/?p=90045"},"modified":"2026-07-29T14:50:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-29T14:50:13","slug":"a1c-vs-hba1c","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/a1c-vs-hba1c\/","title":{"rendered":"A1C vs HbA1c \u2014 Is There Actually a Difference?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If you&#8217;ve looked at a lab report from your US doctor and then compared it to one from a clinic in the UK or Canada, you may have noticed something odd. One says &#8220;A1C.&#8221; The other says &#8220;HbA1c.&#8221; Same blood test, same result, completely different label \u2014 and nobody in the room explains why.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This discrepancy confuses patients constantly, and understandably so. When you&#8217;re managing a chronic condition and two reports use two different terms for what appears to be the same number, it&#8217;s natural to wonder if something is being measured differently. It isn&#8217;t. But the story of how two names ended up for one test is actually worth knowing \u2014 because it affects how you read international lab results and why the numbers don&#8217;t always look identical across borders.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The Short Answer<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A1C and HbA1c are exactly the same test measuring exactly the same thing. &#8220;HbA1c&#8221; is the full scientific name used in labs, journals, and most countries outside the US. &#8220;A1C&#8221; is the simplified version the American Diabetes Association standardized for US clinical and patient use. If your result is 7.0% in New York, it would also be 7.0% if labeled HbA1c in London \u2014 assuming both labs are using NGSP-certified methods.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Where Each Name Comes From<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The full scientific name has always been HbA1c. Breaking it down: &#8220;Hb&#8221; is the chemical symbol for hemoglobin, the iron-rich protein inside red blood cells. &#8220;A&#8221; refers to adult hemoglobin \u2014 the dominant form in healthy adults, making up roughly 95\u201398% of total hemoglobin. The &#8220;1&#8221; identifies a chromatographic fraction that bonds with carbohydrate molecules, and the lowercase &#8220;c&#8221; pinpoints the specific sub-fraction where glucose \u2014 and only glucose \u2014 attaches.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That specificity is why this particular fraction became the diagnostic standard in the first place. The A1a and A1b fractions bond with other sugar-related compounds like fructose and pyruvic acid. Only A1c bonds exclusively with glucose \u2014 which is what makes it an accurate window into long-term blood sugar control. If you want to understand the full chemistry behind that bond, our article on <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/what-does-a1c-stand-for\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">what A1C actually stands for<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> breaks it down step by step.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The simplified &#8220;A1C&#8221; name is an American invention. In the late 1990s, the ADA was working to make diabetes education more accessible. The term &#8220;HbA1c&#8221; was considered intimidating \u2014 hard to pronounce, hard to remember, and unfamiliar-looking to patients who weren&#8217;t scientists. So the ADA officially dropped the &#8220;Hb&#8221; in all its patient-facing materials and standardized the term to &#8220;A1C.&#8221; US clinics, insurance companies, and pharmacy chains followed, and the shorter version became the norm in American healthcare.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>HbA1c<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Full scientific name<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standard in UK, Europe, Canada, Australia<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Used in medical journals worldwide<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Often paired with mmol\/mol (IFCC)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">More common in formal lab reports internationally<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>A1C<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Simplified patient-facing name<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standard in the United States<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adopted by ADA in the late 1990s<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Always reported as a percentage (NGSP)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Used in US clinics, insurance, consumer tools<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>The Units Problem \u2014 Why the Numbers Sometimes Don&#8217;t Match<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Here&#8217;s where it gets slightly more complicated. Even though A1C and HbA1c measure the same thing, labs in different countries don&#8217;t always express the result in the same units. And that&#8217;s where patients get genuinely confused \u2014 not because the tests are different, but because the reporting systems are.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The United States uses the <\/span><b>NGSP<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program) format, which reports results as a percentage. When your doctor says your A1C is 7.2%, that percentage is an NGSP figure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Most of Europe, the UK, and international research institutions use the <\/span><b>IFCC<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (International Federation of Clinical Chemistry) format, which reports in millimoles of glycated hemoglobin per mole of total hemoglobin \u2014 written as mmol\/mol. An A1C of 7.0% in NGSP terms equals 53 mmol\/mol in IFCC terms. The same patient, the same blood, just expressed differently.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A1C \u2014 NGSP (%)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">HbA1c \u2014 IFCC (mmol\/mol)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Est. Average Glucose (mg\/dL)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Clinical Zone<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">39 mmol\/mol<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">117 mg\/dL<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"\/blog\/what-a1c-5-7-means\/\">Prediabetes<\/a> threshold<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">42 mmol\/mol<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">126 mg\/dL<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">High-risk prediabetes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">48 mmol\/mol<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">140 mg\/dL<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Diabetes diagnosis cutoff<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">53 mmol\/mol<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">154 mg\/dL<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standard treatment target<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">8.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">64 mmol\/mol<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">183 mg\/dL<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sub-optimal control<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">9.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">75 mmol\/mol<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">212 mg\/dL<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">High vascular risk<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The conversion between the two isn&#8217;t complicated, but it&#8217;s easy to misread a result if you&#8217;re not expecting the format difference. If you receive an HbA1c report from an international clinic showing a number like 53, don&#8217;t panic \u2014 that&#8217;s equivalent to 7.0% in US terms, which is a standard management target.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Why the IFCC number is always lower than the NGSP percentage:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The IFCC method uses a more chemically precise reference standard \u2014 it excludes certain labile fractions that older methods counted. This produces a lower absolute number. Neither is &#8220;wrong&#8221;; they just measure with different precision. The 2007 international consensus agreement confirmed both systems are valid and encouraged labs to report both on the same result sheet.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>How the Two Standards Came to Coexist \u2014 A Brief History<\/b><\/h2>\n<h3><b>1968: <\/b><b>Dr. Samuel Rahbar identifies HbA1c<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Working in Tehran, Rahbar notices elevated levels of an unusual hemoglobin component in diabetic patients \u2014 the compound that would become the basis of the A1C test.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>1993: <\/b><b>DCCT trial proves A1C&#8217;s clinical value<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial demonstrates definitively that lowering HbA1c reduces microvascular complications. This makes standardized measurement urgent \u2014 results from different labs couldn&#8217;t be reliably compared.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>1996: <\/b><b>NGSP launches in the US<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program anchors US lab results to DCCT data. All certified US labs now produce comparable percentage results.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Late 1990s: <\/b><b>ADA simplifies &#8220;HbA1c&#8221; to &#8220;A1C&#8221;<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The American Diabetes Association drops the &#8220;Hb&#8221; in patient materials to reduce intimidation and improve health literacy. US clinical practice follows.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>2007: <\/b><b>ADA, EASD, and IDF reach global consensus<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">International diabetes organizations agree that both NGSP (%) and IFCC (mmol\/mol) are valid reporting formats. Labs worldwide are encouraged to report both side by side on patient results.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Does the Name on Your Lab Report Affect Anything Practical?<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No \u2014 not for your treatment. Whether your report says A1C or HbA1c, your doctor is looking at the same number and applying the same clinical thresholds. The diabetes diagnosis cutoff is 6.5% regardless of which label appears on the page. The standard treatment target of below 7.0% applies equally to both.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Where it does matter is insurance and billing. In the United States, both A1C and HbA1c tests are billed under the same CPT code: <\/span><b>83036<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <a href=\"\/blog\/medicare-coverage-a1c\/\">Medicare<\/a>, Medicaid, and private insurers recognize both terms as the same test. You won&#8217;t be billed differently, and you won&#8217;t have a claim denied because one term was used instead of the other.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It also matters when comparing results across different time periods or different healthcare systems. If you were tested in the UK last year and have a result in mmol\/mol, and you&#8217;re now being managed in the US with percentage results, your doctor needs to convert between the two before comparing trends. The numbers aren&#8217;t directly comparable on their face \u2014 53 and 7.0% look completely different but mean exactly the same thing.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>At-Home Tests: Does the Name Affect Accuracy?<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"\/blog\/at-home-a1c-accuracy\/\">At-home<\/a> A1C kits sold in the US are calibrated to NGSP standards and report a percentage \u2014 the same format as your US lab report. They don&#8217;t use the HbA1c label, but they&#8217;re measuring the same fraction of glycated hemoglobin. The accuracy question isn&#8217;t really about the name \u2014 it&#8217;s about whether the kit is NGSP-certified and whether a small point-of-care device can match the precision of a hospital HPLC machine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The honest answer is: close, but not identical. Most certified home kits perform well enough for trend tracking between lab visits. They&#8217;re more vulnerable to interference from <a href=\"\/blog\/can-a1c-be-wrong\/\">hemoglobin variants<\/a> and extreme sample conditions than large lab systems. Our article on <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/at-home-a1c-accuracy\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">at-home A1C test accuracy<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> walks through what the research shows about how closely home kits match lab results \u2014 and when the gap matters enough to rely on the lab instead.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>One More Term You Might See: Glycosylated Hemoglobin<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Older lab reports and some medical literature use a third term \u2014 &#8220;glycosylated hemoglobin&#8221; \u2014 as a synonym for HbA1c. Clinically, it means the same thing. Technically, there&#8217;s a slight distinction: glycosylation refers to enzyme-driven sugar attachment, while glycation is the spontaneous non-enzymatic process that actually produces HbA1c. The glucose bonding to hemoglobin in the A1C test is glycation, not glycosylation. But in everyday clinical language, you&#8217;ll see both terms used interchangeably, and either one on a lab report refers to the same test.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>What To Take Away From This<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A1C and HbA1c are the same test. The name difference is geographic and stylistic, not medical.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;HbA1c&#8221; is the scientific name used internationally; &#8220;A1C&#8221; is the ADA-simplified version used in the United States.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The unit difference matters more than the name: US labs report a percentage (NGSP); international labs may report mmol\/mol (IFCC). An A1C of 7.0% equals 53 mmol\/mol.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Both formats are clinically valid. A 2007 global consensus confirmed labs should ideally report both on the same result sheet.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Insurance billing uses the same CPT code (83036) for both. The name on the report doesn&#8217;t affect coverage.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If your result comes from a different country and looks unfamiliar, check whether it&#8217;s in mmol\/mol before assuming anything is wrong.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Got a Result in mmol\/mol?<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If your HbA1c result is in IFCC units from a UK or international clinic, use our <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/calculators\/a1c-to-mmol\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A1C to mmol\/mol converter<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to translate it into the US percentage format \u2014 or the other way around.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Frequently Asked Questions<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><b>If I get tested in the US and then again in Canada, will my results look the same?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The underlying measurement will be the same, but Canadian lab reports may express HbA1c in mmol\/mol (IFCC format) rather than as a percentage. So an A1C of 7.0% from your US lab would appear as 53 mmol\/mol on a Canadian or UK report. Same result, different unit \u2014 just convert between them if you&#8217;re comparing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>My lab report shows both a percentage and a mmol\/mol number. Which one should I focus on?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If you&#8217;re in the US and being treated by a US physician, focus on the percentage \u2014 that&#8217;s what your doctor&#8217;s clinical targets are based on. If you&#8217;re in Europe or the UK, the mmol\/mol figure is primary. Some modern labs report both as a convenience, especially for patients who <a href=\"\/blog\/traveling-with-diabetes\/\">travel<\/a> or compare results internationally.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Is &#8220;glycated hemoglobin&#8221; the same as HbA1c?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Yes, used synonymously in clinical practice. The full form &#8220;glycated hemoglobin&#8221; appears in older literature and some formal lab reports. It describes the same biological process \u2014 glucose bonded to hemoglobin \u2014 that produces the A1C\/HbA1c result.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Does fetal hemoglobin (HbF) interfere with the A1C test?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It can, in some adults. Fetal hemoglobin doesn&#8217;t have the same beta chains as adult hemoglobin, so it doesn&#8217;t glycate in the same way. Adults who retain elevated HbF levels \u2014 a condition called hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin \u2014 may get a falsely low A1C result on standard chromatographic tests. Labs using HPLC will typically flag this on the chromatogram.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Why does my A1C test result sometimes differ from what my CGM suggests?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The A1C and a CGM&#8217;s Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) are measuring related but different things. A1C reflects actual glycated hemoglobin in your blood. GMI is an estimate derived from your average sensor glucose readings. The two can diverge by 0.3\u20130.5 percentage points, especially if you have anemia or certain hemoglobin variants. For a deeper look at why the two don&#8217;t always line up, our article on <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/a1c-vs-cgm\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A1C versus CGM data<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> covers the key differences and when each is more reliable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Is the HbA1c test used to diagnose diabetes in all countries?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In most, yes \u2014 but not all. The US and many other countries accept an HbA1c of 6.5% or above (on two occasions) as diagnostic for type 2 diabetes. Some countries still prefer fasting glucose or oral glucose tolerance tests for diagnosis, particularly because HbA1c can be unreliable in populations with high rates of hemoglobin variants. The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/a1c-vs-fasting-blood-sugar\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">comparison between A1C and fasting blood sugar as diagnostic tools<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> explains the practical trade-offs between these approaches.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What&#8217;s the difference between HbA1c and fructosamine \u2014 and when is fructosamine used instead?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">HbA1c measures glucose bonded to hemoglobin inside red blood cells, reflecting roughly 90 days of blood sugar history. Fructosamine measures glucose bonded to serum proteins (mainly albumin) in the liquid portion of your blood. Because albumin has a much shorter lifespan \u2014 around two to three weeks \u2014 fructosamine gives a shorter-term average. Doctors typically use it when A1C is unreliable, such as in patients with hemolytic anemia, iron deficiency, or hemoglobin variants where the standard test can&#8217;t be trusted.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>References<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3714550\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Weykamp C, et al. \u2014 A Review of the Challenge in Measuring Hemoglobin A1c, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ifcchba1c.net\/hba1c\/standardization\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">IFCC \u2014 Reference Method and Standardization of HbA1c Measurement<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ngsp.org\/docs\/current.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NGSP \u2014 Harmonization of HbA1c Measurement: What Every Laboratory Should Know<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/care.diabetesjournals.org\/content\/30\/9\/2399\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ADA\/EASD\/IDF Consensus Statement \u2014 Recommendations on the Reporting of HbA1c Results, Diabetes Care, 2007<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/diabetesjournals.org\/care\/issue\/46\/Supplement_1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">American Diabetes Association \u2014 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2025, Section 6: Glycemic Targets<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A1C, HbA1c and hemoglobin A1c are the same test under different names. Where each term is used, and the one difference that does matter: units.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3,4],"class_list":["post-90045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-diabetes-basics","tag-a1c","tag-diabetes-education"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90045"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":90109,"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90045\/revisions\/90109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/a1ccalculator.us\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}